Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Fredericksburg
vs
San Antonio
State attribute explanation
Tx
vs
Tx
Street
1208
vs
5756 N Knoll Dr
Zip Code
78,624
vs
78,240
Phone
8,309,973,704
vs
2,103,215,200
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
132
vs
144
Total Number of Residents
103
vs
127
Percent of Occupied Beds
78 %
vs
88 %
Health Survey Date
4/21/2011
vs
9/16/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/20/2011
vs
9/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
96
vs
127
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.34
vs
0.38
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72
vs
1.09
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07
vs
1.46
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 03/14/2010date Of Correction: 04/26/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 04/02/2010date Of Correction: 05/16/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.survey Date: 04/23/2009date Of Correction: 05/26/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 04/02/2010date Of Correction: 05/16/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/23/2009date Of Correction: 05/26/2009
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.survey Date: 04/23/2009date Of Correction: 05/26/2009
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 12/14/2010date Of Correction: 01/01/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.3 %
vs
15.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.3 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.1 %
vs
37.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 %
vs
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6:1
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.2 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22 %
vs
0.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4 %
vs
93.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.9 %
vs
97.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
vs
1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6 %
vs
24 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.4 %
vs
13.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2 %
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.2 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.6 %
vs
40.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 %
vs
6.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 %
vs
16.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
18.4 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.4 %
vs
5.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.8 %
vs
92.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.1 %
vs
97.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
29 %
vs
1.50 %
Compare KNOPP HEALTHCARE AND REHAB CENTER INC vs MESA VISTA INN HEALTH CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel