Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Fredericksburg
vs
Mission
State attribute explanation
Tx
vs
Tx
Street
1208
vs
1013 S Bryan Rd
Zip Code
78,624
vs
78,572
Phone
8,309,973,704
vs
9,565,802,100
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
132
vs
170
Total Number of Residents
103
vs
160
Percent of Occupied Beds
78 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
4/21/2011
vs
5/25/2012
Fire Survey Date
4/20/2011
vs
5/23/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
96
vs
160
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.34
vs
0.62
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72
vs
0.65
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07
vs
1.27
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.11
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.11
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 04/30/2012date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 04/30/2012date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 04/30/2012date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 02/18/2010date Of Correction: 03/08/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.3 %
vs
24.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 %
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4 %
vs
6.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.3 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.1 %
vs
43.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6:1
vs
10.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.2 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22 %
vs
10.3:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4 %
vs
80.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.9 %
vs
86.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
vs
2.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6 %
vs
24.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.4 %
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2 %
vs
10.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.2 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.6 %
vs
38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
18.4 %
vs
9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 %
vs
10.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.4 %
vs
11.6:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.8 %
vs
74.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.1 %
vs
80.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
29 %
vs
39.9 %
Compare KNOPP HEALTHCARE AND REHAB CENTER INC vs MISSION NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel