Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Lexington
vs
Laurel
State attribute explanation
Ms
vs
Ms
Street
56 Rockport Road
vs
940
Zip Code
39,095
vs
39,440
Phone
6,628,343,021
vs
6,016,498,006
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
68
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
64
vs
112
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
93 %
Health Survey Date
12/9/2011
vs
6/15/2011
Fire Survey Date
12/9/2011
vs
6/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Limited Liability Company
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
64
vs
112
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59
vs
0.43
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1
vs
0.92
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
vs
1.35
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.02
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.02
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/21/2009date Of Correction: 01/08/2010
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.survey Date: 04/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.5 %
vs
22 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 %
vs
23.7 (74.7)
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.3 %
vs
14.9-28
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
26.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.4 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
36.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
97.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 %
vs
1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.5 %
vs
20.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3 %
vs
24.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.8 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.9 / 9.9
vs
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.3 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.2 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.6 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
17.5 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.6-28
vs
36.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6 %
vs
95 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
74.3 %
vs
97.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
9.2 %
Compare LEXINGTON MANOR SENIOR CARE, LLC vs CARE CENTER OF LAUREL Nursing Homes USA
cancel