Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Lexington
vs
Ripley
State attribute explanation
Ms
vs
Ms
Street
56 Rockport Road
vs
103 Cunningham Drive
Zip Code
39,095
vs
38,663
Phone
6,628,343,021
vs
6,628,373,062
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
68
vs
60
Total Number of Residents
64
vs
46
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
77 %
Health Survey Date
12/9/2011
vs
2/23/2012
Fire Survey Date
12/9/2011
vs
2/23/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Limited Liability Company
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
4
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
4
# of deficiencies
1
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
64
vs
46
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59
vs
0.88
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1
vs
0.85
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
vs
1.73
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.03
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/04/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 11/04/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/21/2009date Of Correction: 01/08/2010
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 11/04/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 11/04/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.5 %
vs
36.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.3 %
vs
12.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.4 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.9 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
85.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
95.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.5 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3 %
vs
41.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.8 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.9 / 9.9
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.3 %
vs
29.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.2 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.6 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
17.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.6-28
vs
28.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6 %
vs
85.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
74.3 %
vs
11.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Compare LEXINGTON MANOR SENIOR CARE, LLC vs REST HAVEN HEALTH AND REHABILITATION Nursing Homes USA
cancel