Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Lawrenceville
vs
Cumming
State attribute explanation
Ga
vs
Ga
Street
3850 Safehaven Drive
vs
125 Samaritan Drive
Zip Code
30,044
vs
30,040
Phone
7,709,230,005
vs
7,708,890,120
Overall Star Rating
2
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
163
vs
150
Total Number of Residents
153
vs
136
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
91 %
Health Survey Date
4/7/2011
vs
11/10/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/7/2011
vs
11/10/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
153
vs
136
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35
vs
0.51
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.27
vs
0.91
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.62
vs
1.42
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
vs
0.1
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
vs
0.1
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 08/17/2010date Of Correction: 09/10/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/28/2010date Of Correction: 07/14/2010
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.survey Date: 02/03/2010date Of Correction: 03/20/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/05/2012date Of Correction: 04/05/2012
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 %
vs
25.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.6:1
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.1:1
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 %
vs
0.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2 %
vs
3.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.5 %
vs
67.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.3 %
vs
74.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 %
vs
2.5 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.9 %
vs
24.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 %
vs
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.5 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.5 %
vs
27.8 (82.0)
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
17.1:1
vs
9.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.4 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.7 %
vs
79.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.8 %
vs
84.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 %
vs
26.7 %
Compare LIFE CARE CENTER OF GWINNETT vs CHESTNUT RIDGE NSG & REHAB CTR Nursing Homes USA
cancel