Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Americus
vs
Lagrange
State attribute explanation
Ga
vs
Ga
Street
2001 South Lee Street
vs
200 Medical Drive
Zip Code
31,709
vs
30,240
Phone
2,299,249,352
vs
7,068,453,252
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
238
vs
150
Total Number of Residents
207
vs
137
Percent of Occupied Beds
87 %
vs
91 %
Health Survey Date
9/16/2010
vs
3/24/2011
Fire Survey Date
9/16/2010
vs
3/24/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Not Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Church Related
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
Yes
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
1
# of deficiencies
7
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
190
vs
137
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39
vs
0.71
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.95
vs
1.07
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.34
vs
1.78
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.08
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.08
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/05/2011
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 01/04/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 01/04/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/05/2011
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That A Doctor Approves A Resident's Admission In Writing And That Each Resident Remains Under The Care Of A Doctor.survey Date: 01/04/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 01/04/2012date Of Correction: 02/17/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Ensure That All Nurse Aids Who Have Worked Less Than 4 Months Are Enrolled In Appropriate Training Or Have Been Deemed Competent To Provide Nursing And Nursing Related Services.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/05/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.3 %
vs
32.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.1 %
vs
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.9 / 9.9
vs
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2 %
vs
10.7:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.3 %
vs
32.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.6:1
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.1:1
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1 %
vs
30.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6 %
vs
98.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.3 %
vs
97.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 %
vs
4.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.2 %
vs
35.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.4 %
vs
15.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.1 %
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42 %
vs
36.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 %
vs
8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.2 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.7:1
vs
24.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.1 %
vs
96.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
72.4 %
vs
97.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 %
vs
2.8 %
Compare MAGNOLIA MANOR METHODIST NSG C vs FLORENCE HAND HOME Nursing Homes USA
cancel