General
City		New Providence	vs	Maple Shade
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Nj	vs	Nj
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		144 Gales Drive	vs	315 West Mill Road
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		7,974	vs	8,052
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		9,084,648,600	vs	8,567,791,500
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		5	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		4	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		2	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		5	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		4	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		106	vs	165
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		100	vs	159
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		94 %	vs	96 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		12/22/2011	vs	2/2/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		12/22/2011	vs	2/2/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		For Profit - Partnership	vs	For Profit - Corporation
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		75.2	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		75.2	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		5	vs	8
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		100	vs	159
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.9	vs	0.37
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.4	vs	0.88
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.29	vs	1.25
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.08	vs	0.04
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.08	vs	0.04
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/22/2011date Of Correction: 01/15/2012	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 06/14/2010date Of Correction: 06/23/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/15/2009date Of Correction: 08/15/2009	vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/09/2010date Of Correction: 04/05/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/21/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 09/07/2011date Of Correction: 10/30/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Notice To The Resident Before A Room Or Roommate Change.survey Date: 06/14/2010date Of Correction: 06/23/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/30/2009date Of Correction: 12/04/2009	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 02/22/2011date Of Correction: 04/03/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 02/22/2011date Of Correction: 04/03/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/09/2010date Of Correction: 03/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 04/21/2009date Of Correction: 04/21/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 05/08/2009date Of Correction: 06/18/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		8.6:1	vs	34.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		2.1 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		75.2 %	vs	4.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		8.3 %	vs	9.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		5.2 %	vs	3.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		62.5 %	vs	14.9-28
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		1.1 %	vs	4.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		1.3 %	vs	6.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		3.8 %	vs	13.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		12.1:1	vs	24.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		92.4 %	vs	88 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		91.6 %	vs	86 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2	vs	5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		2.5 %	vs	2.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		12 %	vs	34.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		2.4 %	vs	2.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		1.4 %	vs	7.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		6.1 %	vs	10.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		5.3 %	vs	3.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		58.9 %	vs	17.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		0.3 %	vs	3.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		2.8 %	vs	7.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		2.8 %	vs	16.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	5.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		2.4 %	vs	2.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		11.3 %	vs	18 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		90 %	vs	89.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		89.9 %	vs	75.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		15.8 %	vs	3.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES-NEW PROVIDENCE vs PALACE REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER, THE Nursing Homes USA