Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Naperville
vs
Lawrenceville
State attribute explanation
Il
vs
Il
Street
200 Martin Avenue
vs
1620
Zip Code
60,540
vs
62,439
Phone
6,303,554,111
vs
6,189,433,347
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
117
vs
163
Total Number of Residents
93
vs
74
Percent of Occupied Beds
79 %
vs
45 %
Health Survey Date
11/18/2011
vs
3/15/2012
Fire Survey Date
11/30/2011
vs
3/20/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Church Related
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
93
vs
74
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.43
vs
0.94
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.3
vs
0.85
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.73
vs
1.79
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39
vs
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/23/2011date Of Correction: 09/22/2011
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 08/31/2011date Of Correction: 09/13/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 07/08/2011date Of Correction: 08/01/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 08/31/2011date Of Correction: 09/13/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.survey Date: 01/14/2010date Of Correction: 02/12/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.8:1
vs
32.4 (90.3)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
19.5-24
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 %
vs
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.9 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.1 %
vs
13.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.7 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.7 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.6 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4 %
vs
2.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 %
vs
34.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.1 %
vs
25.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 %
vs
8.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3 %
vs
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.5 %
vs
21.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9.4 / 10.4
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.2 %
vs
9.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3 %
vs
6.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.8 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.4 %
vs
32.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.2 %
vs
26.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.3 %
vs
94.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.7 %
vs
93.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 %
vs
8.1 / 8.8
Compare MANORCARE OF NAPERVILLE vs UNITED METHODIST VILLAGE, THE Nursing Homes USA
cancel