General
City		Oak Lawn	vs	La Grange Park
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Il	vs	Il
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		6300 West 95th Street	vs	701 North Lagrange Road
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		60,453	vs	60,526
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		7,085,998,800	vs	7,083,547,300
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		2	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		2	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		2	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		4	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		191	vs	131
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		147	vs	103
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		77 %	vs	79 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		12/2/2011	vs	7/14/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		12/1/2011	vs	8/19/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		For Profit - Corporation	vs	For Profit - Partnership
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		75.2	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		75.2	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		11	vs	9
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		147	vs	106
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.04	vs	0.78
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.72	vs	0.65
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.77	vs	1.44
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.2	vs	0.08
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.2	vs	0.08
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/25/2009date Of Correction: 10/25/2009	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/07/2009date Of Correction: 07/27/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/11/2009date Of Correction: 05/18/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/16/2012date Of Correction: 03/16/2012	vs	Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 03/01/2012date Of Correction: 03/15/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 03/01/2012date Of Correction: 03/15/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3			vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 05/04/2010date Of Correction: 05/31/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 09/09/2011date Of Correction: 10/07/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 01/12/2010date Of Correction: 01/21/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 02/16/2012date Of Correction: 03/16/2012	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 06/28/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/02/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 09/10/2009date Of Correction: 10/05/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/09/2011date Of Correction: 10/07/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 09/09/2011date Of Correction: 10/07/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”
Deficiency #5		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 01/12/2010date Of Correction: 01/21/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”
Deficiency #6		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 08/11/2009date Of Correction: 08/24/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 09/09/2011date Of Correction: 10/07/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 06/28/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 03/01/2012date Of Correction: 03/15/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		23.5 %	vs	24.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		75.2 %	vs	7.9:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		17.2 %	vs	9.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		10 %	vs	8.1 / 8.8
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		54.1 %	vs	15.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		7.3 %	vs	8.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		3.8 %	vs	12.1:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		8.9 / 9.9	vs	6.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		92.9 %	vs	13.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		92.3 %	vs	93.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		2.5 %	vs	4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		23.1 %	vs	27.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		1.9 %	vs	0.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		2.3 %	vs	11.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		16.9-24	vs	10.7:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		9.5 %	vs	7.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		55.9 %	vs	15.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		8.6:1	vs	5.6:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		4.5 %	vs	9.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	4.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		1.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		2 %	vs	2.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		6.9 %	vs	11.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		88.9 %	vs	10.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		92.8 %	vs	94 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		13.9 / 15.3	vs	12.6:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare MANORCARE OF OAK LAWN WEST vs GROVE OF LA GRANGE PARK Nursing Homes USA