Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Amesbury
vs
New Bedford
State attribute explanation
Ma
vs
Ma
Street
6 Morrill Place
vs
397 County Street
Zip Code
1913
vs
2,740
Phone
9,783,883,500
vs
5,089,979,396
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
135
Total Number of Residents
104
vs
104
Percent of Occupied Beds
87 %
vs
77 %
Health Survey Date
8/24/2011
vs
12/14/2011
Fire Survey Date
9/12/2011
vs
1/5/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Partnership
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
104
vs
104
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88
vs
0.8
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96
vs
0.49
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.84
vs
1.3
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.03
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/19/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 04/28/2010date Of Correction: 06/24/2010
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/16/2009date Of Correction: 07/30/2009
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.survey Date: 10/19/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.2 %
vs
27.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.6 / 3
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.9 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
55.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.7 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.5 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.3 %
vs
18.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.4 %
vs
17.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9 %
vs
87.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.5 %
vs
95.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 %
vs
4.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.2 %
vs
27.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.1 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.4 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.2 %
vs
48.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.4 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.4 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.6 %
vs
21.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.1 %
vs
18.6 (65.5)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.2 %
vs
89.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.4 %
vs
96.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
16.4 %
vs
12.9 (55.2)
Compare MAPLEWOOD CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER vs BRANDON WOODS OF NEW BEDFORD Nursing Homes USA
cancel