Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Pittsburg
vs
Howard
State attribute explanation
Ks
vs
Ks
Street
2520 S Rouse St
vs
849 E Washington Street
Zip Code
66,762
vs
67,349
Phone
6,202,310,300
vs
6,203,742,495
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
vs
5
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
60
vs
40
Total Number of Residents
36
vs
30
Percent of Occupied Beds
60 %
vs
75 %
Health Survey Date
1/30/2012
vs
3/13/2012
Fire Survey Date
7/21/2011
vs
12/13/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Government - City/county
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
36
vs
30
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.91
vs
0.98
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94
vs
0.85
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.85
vs
1.83
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2
vs
0.02
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
0.02
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/02/2009
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 06/26/2009
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/02/2009
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/31/2009date Of Correction: 08/30/2009
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/02/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.7 %
vs
25.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.1 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.1:1
vs
12.9 (55.2)
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3 %
vs
9.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 %
vs
24.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.9 (55.2)
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.9 / 15.3
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
71.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 %
vs
10 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.8:1
vs
17.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 %
vs
9.9:1
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.9-28
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.2 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.3 %
vs
77.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5 %
vs
Compare MEDICALODGES PITTSBURG vs HOWARD TWILIGHT MANOR Nursing Homes USA
cancel