Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Nevada
vs
Cedar Hill
State attribute explanation
Mo
vs
Mo
Street
901 South Adams
vs
6400 The Cedars Court
Zip Code
64,772
vs
63,016
Phone
4,174,483,841
vs
6,362,741,777
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
108
vs
150
Total Number of Residents
84
vs
78
Percent of Occupied Beds
78 %
vs
52 %
Health Survey Date
10/7/2011
vs
1/20/2012
Fire Survey Date
10/7/2011
vs
1/20/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Government - City
vs
For Profit - Limited Liability Company
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
vs
2
# of deficiencies
vs
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
84
vs
78
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.28
vs
0.47
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79
vs
0.57
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07
vs
1.03
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.04
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 01/20/2012date Of Correction: 03/19/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 02/26/2010date Of Correction: 04/09/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 04/13/2011date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/12/2010date Of Correction: 08/16/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 02/26/2010date Of Correction: 04/09/2010
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 03/21/2011date Of Correction: 05/06/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.5 %
vs
44.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.7 %
vs
18.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.1 / 8.8
vs
14.9-28
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.6 / 3
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.8 %
vs
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
39.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.3 %
vs
51.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.3 %
vs
64.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
1
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
vs
6.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.7:1
vs
42.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.1 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.4 %
vs
16.3:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3 %
vs
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.8:1
vs
12.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.7 (74.7)
vs
36.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 %
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 %
vs
13.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.2 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
41.2 %
vs
32 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.5 %
vs
46.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.5 %
vs
22.7 (72.9)
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.9 / 9.9
vs
75.2 %
Compare MOORE-FEW CARE CENTER vs CEDAR RIDGE MANOR Nursing Homes USA
cancel