Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Wheat Ridge
vs
Colorado Springs
State attribute explanation
Co
vs
Co
Street
4800 Tabor Street
vs
12205 Gunstock Drive
Zip Code
80,033
vs
80,921
Phone
3,034,214,161
vs
7,194,815,007
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
5
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
168
vs
42
Total Number of Residents
149
vs
40
Percent of Occupied Beds
89 %
vs
95 %
Health Survey Date
4/12/2012
vs
4/12/2012
Fire Survey Date
5/9/2012
vs
5/1/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Church Related
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
Yes
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
149
vs
40
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74
vs
1.41
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86
vs
0.51
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.6
vs
1.92
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
1.18
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
1.18
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.survey Date: 12/21/2011date Of Correction: 01/26/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 12/21/2011date Of Correction: 01/26/2012
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 06/08/2011
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 04/21/2011date Of Correction: 06/08/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.6 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.8 %
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.20 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.9 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 %
vs
16.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.3 %
vs
94.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.4 %
vs
92.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2 %
vs
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.3 %
vs
15.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 %
vs
15.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.6:1
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 %
vs
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
63.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.5 %
vs
9.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.20 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.3 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.6 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.8 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 %
vs
23.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.9 %
vs
95.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.8 %
vs
94.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
22.7 (72.9)
vs
29.4 %
Compare MOUNTAIN VISTA HEALTH CENTER vs LIBERTY HEIGHTS Nursing Homes USA
cancel