Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Greenville
vs
Hazard
State attribute explanation
Ky
vs
Ky
Street
440 Hopkinsville St.
vs
390 Park Avenue, P O Box 1329
Zip Code
42,345
vs
41,702
Phone
2,703,388,431
vs
6,064,392,306
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
45
vs
200
Total Number of Residents
39
vs
193
Percent of Occupied Beds
87 %
vs
97 %
Health Survey Date
4/22/2011
vs
10/20/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/22/2011
vs
10/20/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
1
# of deficiencies
vs
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
39
vs
193
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.06
vs
0.33
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.92
vs
0.86
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.98
vs
1.19
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22
vs
0.09
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22
vs
0.09
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/12/2009date Of Correction: 06/05/2009
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
vs
34.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
28.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
vs
11.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
25.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
vs
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
vs
16.3:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
vs
3.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.3 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98 %
vs
88.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99 %
vs
84.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
vs
5.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.4 %
vs
34.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 %
vs
32 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.9 %
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.9 / 9.9
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
28.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.8 %
vs
7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.8 %
vs
13.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.6 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.8 %
vs
54.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.2 %
vs
86.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.7 %
vs
83.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.5 %
vs
12.6:1
Compare MUHLENBERG COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs HAZARD HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel