Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Greenville
vs
Louisville
State attribute explanation
Ky
vs
Ky
Street
440 Hopkinsville St.
vs
1705 Stevens Avenue
Zip Code
42,345
vs
40,205
Phone
2,703,388,431
vs
5,024,517,330
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
45
vs
154
Total Number of Residents
39
vs
136
Percent of Occupied Beds
87 %
vs
88 %
Health Survey Date
4/22/2011
vs
2/9/2012
Fire Survey Date
4/22/2011
vs
2/8/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
3
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
39
vs
136
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.06
vs
0.25
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.92
vs
0.95
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.98
vs
1.21
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22
vs
0.02
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22
vs
0.02
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/17/2011date Of Correction: 12/29/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 09/24/2009date Of Correction: 11/04/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 11/17/2011date Of Correction: 12/29/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 11/17/2011date Of Correction: 12/29/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/17/2011date Of Correction: 12/29/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
vs
34.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
vs
8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
vs
6.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.3 %
vs
18.2:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98 %
vs
91.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99 %
vs
86.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
vs
0.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.4 %
vs
37.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 %
vs
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.9 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.9 / 9.9
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
47 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.8 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3 %
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.8 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.6 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.8 %
vs
12.9 (55.2)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.2 %
vs
92.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.7 %
vs
83.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Compare MUHLENBERG COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs HIGHLANDS NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel