Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Haverhill
vs
Canton
State attribute explanation
Ma
vs
Ma
Street
689 Main Street
vs
601 Sherman Street
Zip Code
1830
vs
2,021
Phone
9,783,731,131
vs
7,818,287,450
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
154
Total Number of Residents
110
vs
126
Percent of Occupied Beds
92 %
vs
82 %
Health Survey Date
11/3/2011
vs
4/11/2011
Fire Survey Date
11/3/2011
vs
4/13/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
110
vs
133
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.48
vs
0.51
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1
vs
0.93
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
vs
1.44
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
vs
0.1
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
vs
0.1
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 03/05/2012date Of Correction: 04/30/2012
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Ensure That All Full-time Nurse Aids Employed For More Than 4 Months Are Fully Trained And Competent To Provide Nursing And Nursing-related Services, As Defined By Federal Requirements.survey Date: 07/07/2009date Of Correction: 08/07/2009
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.survey Date: 08/31/2011date Of Correction: 10/10/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.6 %
vs
16 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 %
vs
8.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9 %
vs
13.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.9 %
vs
5.6:1
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.8 %
vs
26.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9 %
vs
96.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.2 %
vs
92.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 %
vs
4.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
39.4 %
vs
17.9 (64.2)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.5 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2 %
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49.3 %
vs
30.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
vs
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.3 %
vs
12.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.3 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 %
vs
5.6:1
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.2:1
vs
22.7 (72.9)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.4 %
vs
91.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.5 %
vs
87.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
17.8:1
vs
2.6 / 3
Compare OXFORD, THE vs HELLENIC NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel