Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Rockaway Park
vs
Brooklyn
State attribute explanation
Ny
vs
Ny
Street
128 Beach 115th Street
vs
144 So Oxford St
Zip Code
11,694
vs
11,217
Phone
7,184,746,400
vs
7,186,380,360
Overall Star Rating
2
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
196
vs
235
Total Number of Residents
180
vs
207
Percent of Occupied Beds
92 %
vs
88 %
Health Survey Date
4/12/2012
vs
6/10/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/12/2012
vs
6/10/2011
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered
vs
Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Individual
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
180
vs
207
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.23
vs
0.28
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63
vs
0.7
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86
vs
0.98
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.05
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.05
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 04/04/2012date Of Correction: 05/19/2012
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Coordinate Assessments With The Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review Program For Mentally-ill And Mentally-retarded Patients.survey Date: 04/04/2012date Of Correction: 05/15/2012
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.survey Date: 04/20/2010date Of Correction: 04/28/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40.5 %
vs
52.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.7 %
vs
12.4-2413.6-24
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.1 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
17.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
42.9 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 %
vs
7.9:1
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.4 %
vs
51.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.50 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7 %
vs
3.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.6 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42 %
vs
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
22.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
vs
17.3:1
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.5 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
40.8 %
vs
100 %
Compare PARK NURSING HOME vs OXFORD NURSING HOME Nursing Homes USA
cancel