Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Beaumont
vs
Temple
State attribute explanation
Tx
vs
Tx
Street
4195 Milam St
vs
1700 Marland Wood Rd
Zip Code
77,707
vs
76,502
Phone
4,098,424,550
vs
2,547,436,200
Overall Star Rating
2
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
214
vs
106
Total Number of Residents
122
vs
74
Percent of Occupied Beds
57 %
vs
70 %
Health Survey Date
7/20/2011
vs
3/8/2012
Fire Survey Date
7/20/2011
vs
3/8/2012
Sprinkler Status
Not Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
122
vs
74
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32
vs
0.57
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.27
vs
0.83
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
vs
1.4
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/05/2012date Of Correction: 07/02/2012
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 12/31/2009date Of Correction: 01/25/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/05/2012date Of Correction: 07/02/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 06/05/2012date Of Correction: 07/02/2012
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 07/22/2009date Of Correction: 08/14/2009
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/10/2010date Of Correction: 01/10/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/22/2009date Of Correction: 08/14/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30 %
vs
11.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.5 %
vs
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 %
vs
14.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.9 %
vs
26.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6 %
vs
11.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5 %
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7 %
vs
43.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.8 %
vs
31 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.5 %
vs
71.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
50 %
vs
69.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
4.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.7 %
vs
12.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.1:1
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7 %
vs
12.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.4 %
vs
10.7:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.4 %
vs
34 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.6 / 3
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9 %
vs
14 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.1 %
vs
32.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.3 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 %
vs
28.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.9 %
vs
70.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
22.9 %
vs
83 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.4 %
vs
16 %
Compare PHP THE OAKS AT BEAUMONT vs TEMPLE LIVING CENTER WEST Nursing Homes USA
cancel