Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Memphis
vs
Church Hill
State attribute explanation
Tn
vs
Tn
Street
131 N Tucker
vs
701 West Main Blvd
Zip Code
38,104
vs
37,642
Phone
9,017,265,600
vs
4,233,577,178
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
169
vs
124
Total Number of Residents
126
vs
116
Percent of Occupied Beds
75 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
12/15/2011
vs
3/16/2011
Fire Survey Date
12/13/2011
vs
3/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
126
vs
114
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72
vs
0.76
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87
vs
0.7
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.58
vs
1.46
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.03
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 08/29/2011date Of Correction: 09/09/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 08/29/2011date Of Correction: 09/09/2011
vs
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 06/05/2012date Of Correction: 06/08/2012
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3 %
vs
29.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
18.5 %
vs
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.7 %
vs
46.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16.7 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.5 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
63 %
vs
74.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70.8 %
vs
66.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
10 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 %
vs
4.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.9 %
vs
31.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.9 / 9.9
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49.5 %
vs
33 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.4 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
vs
3.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.1 %
vs
78.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
67.8 %
vs
70.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 %
vs
15.7 %
Compare POPLAR POINT HEALTH & REHABILITATION vs CHURCH HILL CARE & REHAB CTR Nursing Homes USA
cancel