General
City		Joliet	vs	Gilman
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Il	vs	Il
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		210 North Springfield Avenue	vs	1390 South Crescent Street, Box 307
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		60,435	vs	60,938
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		8,157,253,400	vs	8,152,657,208
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		3	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		2	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		5	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		2	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		5	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		176	vs	99
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		149	vs	66
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		85 %	vs	67 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		9/2/2011	vs	6/28/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		9/7/2011	vs	6/25/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Partially Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		Non Profit - Church Related	vs	For Profit - Corporation
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		7	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		7	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		9	vs	12
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		149	vs	66
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.7	vs	0.49
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.44	vs	0.89
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		2.14	vs	1.39
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.09	vs	0.09
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.09	vs	0.09
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/18/2011date Of Correction: 03/19/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/17/2012date Of Correction: 05/21/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/16/2009date Of Correction: 10/27/2009	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 11/29/2011date Of Correction: 11/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/26/2009date Of Correction: 11/13/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/14/2009date Of Correction: 06/02/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give The Resident's Representative The Ability To Exercise The Resident's Rights.survey Date: 12/07/2010date Of Correction: 12/23/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/16/2011date Of Correction: 09/12/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/29/2011date Of Correction: 11/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/31/2010date Of Correction: 04/30/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 07/23/2009date Of Correction: 08/22/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/31/2010date Of Correction: 04/30/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 07/23/2009date Of Correction: 08/22/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/11/2009date Of Correction: 09/01/2009	vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 05/14/2009date Of Correction: 06/02/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”
Deficiency #5			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.survey Date: 04/15/2009date Of Correction: 05/26/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”
Deficiency #6			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.survey Date: 04/15/2009date Of Correction: 05/26/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”
Deficiency #7			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 04/15/2009date Of Correction: 05/26/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #7”

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.survey Date: 04/13/2011date Of Correction: 04/13/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 11/29/2011date Of Correction: 11/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 04/13/2011date Of Correction: 04/13/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		21.6 %	vs	23.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		2.20 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		12.1:1	vs	12.4-2413.6-24
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		6.3 %	vs	14.7:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		8.3 %	vs	1.50 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		36.8 %	vs	31.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		3.5 %	vs	1.50 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		7.7 %	vs	1.50 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		4.4 %	vs	4.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		24.5 %	vs	42.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		94.4 %	vs	84.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		94.5 %	vs	79.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		5.5 %	vs	3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		21.7 %	vs	23.8:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		1.3 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		9.5 %	vs	9.4 / 10.4
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		6.6 %	vs	8.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		6.8 %	vs	4.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		42.3 %	vs	36.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		5.7 %	vs	3.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		13.2 %	vs	3.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		7.9:1	vs	1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		2.20 %	vs	4.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		3.9 %	vs	5.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		23.9 %	vs	31.4 (88.5)
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		94.4 %	vs	81 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		92.7 %	vs	76.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		20.4 %	vs	15.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare PROVENA VILLA FRANCISCAN vs GILMAN HEALTHCARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA