Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Rolla
vs
Cape Girardeau
State attribute explanation
Mo
vs
Mo
Street
1800 White Columns Drive
vs
2001 North Kingshighway
Zip Code
65,401
vs
63,701
Phone
5,733,647,766
vs
5,733,351,999
Overall Star Rating
2
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
Number of Certified Beds
102
vs
33
Total Number of Residents
95
vs
27
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
vs
82 %
Health Survey Date
4/20/2012
vs
8/25/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/20/2012
vs
8/25/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
95
vs
27
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.3
vs
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64
vs
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94
vs
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 01/24/2011date Of Correction: 03/09/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 03/30/2011date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 03/30/2011date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.survey Date: 03/30/2011date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 01/24/2011date Of Correction: 03/09/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 01/24/2011date Of Correction: 03/09/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.1 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.4 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.5 %
vs
29.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.3 %
vs
58.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.1 %
vs
20 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 %
vs
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.7 %
vs
37.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.6 / 3
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.6 %
vs
16.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3 %
vs
9.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.1 (71.8)
vs
30.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.2 %
vs
68.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.7 %
vs
12.8:1
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.8:1
vs
1.50 %
Compare ROLLA MANOR CARE CENTER vs FOUNTAINBLEAU LODGE Nursing Homes USA
cancel