VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare SALMON BROOK CENTER VS CURTIS HOME - ST ELIZABETH CEN
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 71 differences and 13 similarities between SALMON BROOK CENTER, CURTIS HOME - ST ELIZABETH CEN
 
General
City   Glastonbury vs   Meriden  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Ct vs   Ct  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   72 Salmon Brook Dr vs   380 Crown Street  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   6,033 vs   6,450  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   8,606,335,244 vs   2,032,374,338  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
2
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
2
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
130
vs   60
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
123
vs   56
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
95 %
vs   93 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   11/10/2011 vs   3/29/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   11/9/2011 vs   3/29/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   Non Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   21 vs   1  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
123
vs   56
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.55
vs   0.84
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.5 - 2.0
vs   0.67
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.05
vs   1.51
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.25
vs   0.01
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.25
vs   0.01
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/21/2011date Of Correction: 02/21/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/12/2011date Of Correction: 05/17/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 10/22/2010date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 10/22/2010date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Deficiency #7   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #7”

Deficiency #8   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/12/2011date Of Correction: 05/17/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #8”

Deficiency #9   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 04/12/2011date Of Correction: 05/17/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #9”

Deficiency #10   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 08/05/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #10”

Deficiency #11   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 07/01/2010date Of Correction: 08/05/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #11”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 04/12/2011date Of Correction: 05/17/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 11/10/2011date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
17.3:1
vs   30.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
8 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
5.5 %
vs   7.9:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
1.2 %
vs   6.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
28.6 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
3.5 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
3.6 %
vs   10.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs   1.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   6.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
19 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
84.8 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
85 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
7.2 %
vs   6.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
15.7 %
vs   31.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.50 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
17.1:1
vs   4.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
9.4 / 10.4
vs   6.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
7.1 %
vs   4.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
28.9 %
vs   66.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
5 %
vs   0.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
4.7 %
vs   10.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs   4.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
0.4 %
vs   5.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
7 %
vs   20.7 (69.3)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
19.4:1
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
78 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
81.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
32.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare SALMON BROOK CENTER vs CURTIS HOME - ST ELIZABETH CEN Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved