Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Daytona Beach
vs
Sarasota
State attribute explanation
Fl
vs
Fl
Street
1001 S Beach Street
vs
3250 12th St
Zip Code
32,114
vs
34,237
Phone
3,862,583,334
vs
9,413,654,185
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
99
vs
87
Total Number of Residents
80
vs
82
Percent of Occupied Beds
81 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
9/22/2011
vs
10/27/2011
Fire Survey Date
9/22/2011
vs
10/31/2011
Sprinkler Status
Not Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
80
vs
82
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.5 - 2.0
vs
0.62
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.44
vs
0.83
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.93
vs
1.45
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.07
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 01/10/2012date Of Correction: 01/31/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 11/22/2011date Of Correction: 11/24/2011
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.survey Date: 09/27/2010date Of Correction: 10/27/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 09/27/2010date Of Correction: 10/27/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.4 %
vs
18.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.6 %
vs
15 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.3:1
vs
3.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
17.9 (64.2)
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.2 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.9 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.50 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
66.7 %
vs
24.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.9 %
vs
72.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.1 %
vs
73.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 %
vs
4.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.9 %
vs
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.5 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.7 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
23.3 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 %
vs
56.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.7 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.7 %
vs
11.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.8 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
53.3 %
vs
17.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.6 %
vs
76.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.2 %
vs
78.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.6:1
vs
4.2 %
Compare SANDALWOOD NURSING CENTER vs HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER - NORTH SARASOTA Nursing Homes USA
cancel