VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Overview:

There are 63 differences and 23 similarities between SPRING CREEK HEALTH CARE CENTER, HIGHLINE REHABILITATION AND CARE COMMUNITY
 
General
City   Fort Collins vs   Denver  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Co vs   Co  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   1000 East Stuart Street vs   6060 East Iliff Avenue  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   80,525 vs   80,222  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   9,704,825,712 vs   3,037,594,221  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
1
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
3
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
2
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
4
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
138
vs   120
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
97
vs   110
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
70 %
vs   92 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   10/25/2011 vs   10/20/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   11/10/2011 vs   11/9/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Limited Liability Company vs   For Profit - Individual  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
1
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   23 vs   5  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
97
vs   110
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.83
vs   0.59
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.79
vs   0.92
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.62
vs   1.51
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.09
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.09
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/30/2011date Of Correction: Not Available vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/12/2011date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 01/12/2011date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 09/21/2010date Of Correction: 10/26/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Listen To The Resident Or Family Groups Or Act On Their Complaints Or Suggestions.survey Date: 01/15/2010date Of Correction: 02/21/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 01/12/2011date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 01/12/2011date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 12/03/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 12/03/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 10/14/2009date Of Correction: 12/10/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 09/21/2010date Of Correction: 10/26/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.survey Date: 06/30/2011date Of Correction: Not Available vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 01/12/2011date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 10/25/2011date Of Correction: 11/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
13.8 %
vs   21.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2.20 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
14 %
vs   3.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
5 %
vs   13.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
9.6 %
vs   3.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
67.4 %
vs   63 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
13.2 %
vs   4.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
13.3 %
vs   8.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
9.6 %
vs   11.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
1.2 %
vs   1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
29.5 %
vs   30.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
64.6 %
vs   54.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
67 %
vs   47.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
5.3 %
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
1.2 %
vs   7.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
14.2 %
vs   20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.50 %
vs   0.5 - 2.0
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
19.1:1
vs   3.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
4.7 %
vs   13.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
9.7 %
vs   4.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
56.8 %
vs   57.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
12.5 %
vs   6.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
8.9 / 9.9
vs   10.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
10.1:1
vs   10.7:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
1.9 %
vs   1.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
2.7 %
vs   5.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
32.1 %
vs   24.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
64.9 %
vs   63.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
63.1 %
vs   60.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
12.8:1
vs   12.3:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare SPRING CREEK HEALTH CARE CENTER vs HIGHLINE REHABILITATION AND CARE COMMUNITY Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved