Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Columbia
vs
Elizabethtown
State attribute explanation
Ky
vs
Ky
Street
400 Bomar Heights
vs
1117 Woodland Drive
Zip Code
42,728
vs
42,701
Phone
2,703,842,153
vs
2,707,692,363
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
104
vs
112
Total Number of Residents
100
vs
108
Percent of Occupied Beds
96 %
vs
96 %
Health Survey Date
3/8/2012
vs
8/4/2011
Fire Survey Date
3/7/2012
vs
8/3/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
4
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
4
# of deficiencies
2
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
100
vs
108
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.56
vs
0.63
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59
vs
0.76
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.15
vs
1.39
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.05
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.05
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/20/2009date Of Correction: 09/03/2009
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/15/2010date Of Correction: 12/23/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/06/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/28/2010date Of Correction: 11/22/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 08/20/2009date Of Correction: 09/15/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.9 %
vs
34.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5 %
vs
30.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8 %
vs
16.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.8:1
vs
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
21.2:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.8 %
vs
7.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16.3:1
vs
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 %
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.4 %
vs
4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.6:1
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88 %
vs
95.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.1 %
vs
97.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 %
vs
1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8 %
vs
31.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5 %
vs
31.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9 %
vs
11.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.6 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.5 %
vs
23.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.6 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
17.9 (64.2)
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 %
vs
3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.3 %
vs
25 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.9 %
vs
96.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.9 %
vs
95.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
27.7 %
vs
20.3 %
Compare SUMMIT MANOR HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER vs WOODLAND TERRACE HEALTH CARE Nursing Homes USA
cancel