VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare SUNNY ACRES VS SENECA HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 56 differences and 27 similarities between SUNNY ACRES, SENECA HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER
 
General
City   Fork vs   Seneca  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Sc vs   Sc  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   1727 Buck Swamp Road vs   140 Tokeena Rd  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   29,543 vs   29,678  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   8,434,646,212 vs   8,648,821,642  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
3
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
4
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
1
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
3
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
111
vs   132
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
109
vs   118
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
98 %
vs   89 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   5/16/2012 vs   6/8/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   5/17/2012 vs   6/7/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Limited Liability Company  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
1
vs   20
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
109
vs   118
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.33
vs   0.75
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.04
vs   0.72
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.37
vs   1.47
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.02
vs   0.07
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.02
vs   0.07
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 12/01/2010date Of Correction: 12/31/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 03/19/2012date Of Correction: 04/18/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 03/19/2012date Of Correction: 04/18/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 03/19/2012date Of Correction: 04/18/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/08/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 06/08/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Deficiency #7    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #7”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Follow Policies And Procedures To Convey The Resident's Personal Funds To The Appropriate Party Responsible After The Resident's Death.survey Date: 06/08/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home.survey Date: 06/08/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 03/19/2012date Of Correction: 04/18/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.survey Date: 06/08/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/08/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/04/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
28.1 %
vs   26.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
75.2 %
vs   1.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
13.7 %
vs   21.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
3.2 %
vs   7.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
8.2 %
vs   8.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
59.4 %
vs   62.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
5.5 %
vs   6.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
13.3 %
vs   11 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
2 %
vs   1.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
4.1 %
vs   5.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
21.7 %
vs   24.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
76.5 %
vs   86.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
77.1 %
vs   94.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2
vs   2.6 / 3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
4.1 %
vs   5.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
26.2 %
vs   23.7 (74.7)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
75.2 %
vs   1.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
11 %
vs   20.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
4.7 %
vs   7.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
7.8 %
vs   10.3:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
56.5 %
vs   60.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
5.1 %
vs   5.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
11.5 %
vs   13.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
1.3 %
vs   0.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
5 %
vs   3.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
4 %
vs   4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
24.5 %
vs   22.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
82.3 %
vs   85.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
82.6 %
vs   95.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
8 %
vs   19.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare SUNNY ACRES vs SENECA HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved