Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Kansas City
vs
Poplar Bluff
State attribute explanation
Mo
vs
Mo
Street
5900 Swope Parkway
vs
3100 Warrior Lane, Po Box 1328
Zip Code
64,130
vs
63,901
Phone
8,163,332,700
vs
5,737,850,851
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
240
vs
132
Total Number of Residents
105
vs
100
Percent of Occupied Beds
44 %
vs
76 %
Health Survey Date
5/16/2011
vs
6/7/2012
Fire Survey Date
5/16/2011
vs
6/7/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
105
vs
100
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49
vs
0.55
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42
vs
0.74
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.91
vs
1.29
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.02
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.02
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/03/2012date Of Correction: 02/10/2012
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/28/2011date Of Correction: 04/11/2011
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 02/28/2011date Of Correction: 04/11/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 07/22/2009date Of Correction: 08/22/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.8:1
vs
27.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 %
vs
11.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.1 %
vs
9.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4 %
vs
11.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.9 %
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.7 %
vs
22.4:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.5 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.2 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 %
vs
3.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11 %
vs
25.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.7 %
vs
26.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.7 %
vs
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 %
vs
7.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.1:1
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.8 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
vs
4.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.3 %
vs
23.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.3 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.1 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.1:1
vs
8.6:1
Compare SWOPE RIDGE GERIATRIC CENTER vs WESTWOOD HILLS HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel