VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare TENDERCARE CLARE VS HOYT NURSING & REHAB CENTRE
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 48 differences and 27 similarities between TENDERCARE CLARE, HOYT NURSING & REHAB CENTRE
 
General
City   Clare vs   Saginaw  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Mi vs   Mi  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   600 Se 4th St vs   1202 Weiss St  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   48,617 vs   48,602  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   9,893,867,723 vs   9,897,541,419  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
3
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
3
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
123
vs   128
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
80
vs   105
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
65 %
vs   82 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   3/9/2012 vs   4/27/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   3/9/2012 vs   4/25/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Partially Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
6
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
7
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
12
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
80
vs   105
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.75
vs   0.75
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.71
vs   0.77
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.46
vs   1.52
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.07
vs   0.05
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.07
vs   0.05
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/29/2011date Of Correction: 12/13/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/06/2012date Of Correction: 02/10/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.survey Date: 07/13/2011date Of Correction: 08/12/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/16/2009date Of Correction: 01/15/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/02/2010date Of Correction: 07/21/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.survey Date: 06/03/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 02/07/2012date Of Correction: 02/29/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 01/06/2012date Of Correction: 02/10/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 12/06/2010date Of Correction: 12/28/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/22/2010date Of Correction: 07/26/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 07/02/2010date Of Correction: 07/21/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.survey Date: 07/02/2010date Of Correction: 07/21/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
18.2:1
vs   6.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.4 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
19.3 %
vs   10 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
5.1 %
vs   4.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
9.6 %
vs   7.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder    vs   62 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
7.8 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
16.2 %
vs   20.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs   1.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
6.8 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
23 %
vs   20.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
89.5 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
88.2 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2 %
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
2.7 %
vs   3.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
17.3:1
vs   6.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.4 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
15.4 %
vs   16 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
4.5 %
vs   4.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
10.6 %
vs   9.4 / 10.4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
55 %
vs   57.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
5.5 %
vs   0.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
7.8 %
vs   17.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs   1.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
6.8 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
2.3 %
vs   4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
20 %
vs   22.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
83.7 %
vs   99.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
80 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2 %
vs   12.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare TENDERCARE CLARE vs HOYT NURSING & REHAB CENTRE Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved