Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Lake Worth
vs
Port Saint Joe
State attribute explanation
Fl
vs
Fl
Street
1711 6th Avenue South
vs
220 Ninth Street
Zip Code
33,460
vs
32,456
Phone
5,615,860,808
vs
8,502,298,244
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
99
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
87
vs
107
Percent of Occupied Beds
88 %
vs
89 %
Health Survey Date
10/13/2011
vs
5/18/2012
Fire Survey Date
10/12/2011
vs
5/17/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
87
vs
107
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.41
vs
0.41
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8
vs
0.88
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.21
vs
1.29
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.07
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 03/23/2010date Of Correction: 04/22/2010
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.survey Date: 06/30/2011date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 06/30/2011date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 08/30/2010date Of Correction: 09/01/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 12/03/2010date Of Correction: 01/12/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 12/03/2010date Of Correction: 01/12/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.2:1
vs
30.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.20 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.4 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.5 %
vs
17.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 %
vs
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.9 (64.2)
vs
17.9 (64.2)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.8 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.7 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 %
vs
30.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.8 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.6:1
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.5 %
vs
18 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 %
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8 %
vs
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.2 (68.4)
vs
14.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.5 %
vs
99.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.2 %
vs
97.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.6 %
vs
17.5 %
Compare TERRACES OF LAKE WORTH REHABILITATION AND HEALTH C vs BRIDGE AT BAY ST JOE, THE Nursing Homes USA
cancel