General
City		Washington	vs	Chicago
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Il	vs	Il
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		1201 Newcastle	vs	1425 West Estes Avenue
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		61,571	vs	60,626
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		3,094,443,161	vs	7,739,734,780
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		5	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		4	vs	5
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		5	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		122	vs	160
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		89	vs	151
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		73 %	vs	94 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		12/15/2011	vs	4/13/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		12/13/2011	vs	4/17/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		Non Profit - Church Related	vs	For Profit - Individual
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		75.2	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		75.2	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		9	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		89	vs	151
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.96	vs	0.53
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.64	vs	0.45
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.6	vs	0.98
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.13	vs	0.01
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.13	vs	0.01
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 05/22/2012date Of Correction: 05/31/2012	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/29/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.survey Date: 07/29/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 09/16/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 11/17/2010date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 09/08/2009date Of Correction: 09/26/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 07/29/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 05/22/2012date Of Correction: 05/24/2012	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 09/16/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 09/16/2011	vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 01/12/2010date Of Correction: 02/01/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 09/16/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		14.5 %	vs	32.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		1.8 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		7 %	vs	4.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		75.2 %	vs	12.1:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		5.9 %	vs	3.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder			vs	25.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		6.7 %	vs	1.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		75.2 %	vs	6.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	11.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		1.50 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		12.4-2413.6-24	vs	7.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		96.6 %	vs	66.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		95.7 %	vs	61.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2 %	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		75.2 %	vs	0.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		14.9-28	vs	32.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		1.6 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		7.3 %	vs	3.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		1.8 %	vs	14.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		7.5 %	vs	2.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		34.5 %	vs	23.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		6.2 %	vs	1.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		3.8 %	vs	4.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		2.3 %	vs	7.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		1.4 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		0.9 %	vs	0.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		10.6 %	vs	12.6:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		96.6 %	vs	57.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		97.5 %	vs	5.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		23.8:1	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare WASHINGTON CHRISTIAN VILLAGE vs ATRIUM HEALTH CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA