Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Evanston
vs
Mattoon
State attribute explanation
Il
vs
Il
Street
3200 Grant Street
vs
2121 South Ninth
Zip Code
60,201
vs
61,938
Phone
8,474,924,800
vs
2,172,357,138
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
105
vs
148
Total Number of Residents
82
vs
67
Percent of Occupied Beds
78 %
vs
45 %
Health Survey Date
10/13/2011
vs
10/21/2011
Fire Survey Date
10/13/2011
vs
11/15/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
82
vs
67
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.96
vs
0.64
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
vs
0.94
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.11
vs
1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.33
vs
75.2
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.33
vs
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/28/2009date Of Correction: 06/09/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/24/2010date Of Correction: 04/01/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 06/30/2009date Of Correction: 07/01/2009
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/28/2009date Of Correction: 06/09/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.7:1
vs
16.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.50 %
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.9 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65 %
vs
40 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 %
vs
10.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.7:1
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.6 %
vs
86.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.1 %
vs
86.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 %
vs
4.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.3:1
vs
17.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.2 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.50 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 %
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
56.7 %
vs
38.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 %
vs
11.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3 %
vs
11.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.7 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 %
vs
3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8 %
vs
4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.4 %
vs
86.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.3 %
vs
93 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 %
vs
27.4 %
Compare WESTMINSTER PLACE vs MATTOON HEALTHCARE AND REHAB CTR Nursing Homes USA
cancel