Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Rock Hill
vs
Fountain Inn
State attribute explanation
Sc
vs
Sc
Street
1915 Ebenezer Rd
vs
501 Gulliver St
Zip Code
29,732
vs
29,644
Phone
8,033,668,155
vs
8,648,622,554
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
141
vs
60
Total Number of Residents
128
vs
56
Percent of Occupied Beds
91 %
vs
93 %
Health Survey Date
11/30/2011
vs
4/4/2012
Fire Survey Date
11/29/2011
vs
4/5/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
128
vs
56
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.71
vs
0.74
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.06
vs
1.05
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.76
vs
1.8
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.1
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.1
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/12/2011date Of Correction: 10/27/2011
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/19/2010date Of Correction: 11/19/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 11/17/2009date Of Correction: 12/14/2009
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 12/06/2011date Of Correction: 01/05/2012
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 12/06/2011date Of Correction: 01/05/2012
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 %
vs
20.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.4 %
vs
11.6:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6 %
vs
18.6 (65.5)
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6 %
vs
30.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.4 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.6 %
vs
90.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82.2 %
vs
83.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 %
vs
9.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.2 %
vs
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 %
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.3 %
vs
12.9 (55.2)
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.2 %
vs
50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 %
vs
15.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3 %
vs
17.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.7 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.1 %
vs
94.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.3 %
vs
87.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.2 %
vs
4.5 %
Compare WHITE OAK MANOR - ROCK HILL vs FOUNTAIN INN CONVALESCENT CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel