General
City		Louisville	vs	Corinth
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Ms	vs	Ms
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		562 East Main Stree/p. O. Box 967	vs	302 Alcorn Drive
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		39,339	vs	38,834
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		6,627,736,211	vs	6,622,862,286
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		2	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		3	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		2	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		120	vs	95
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		110	vs	91
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		92 %	vs	96 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		9/29/2011	vs	9/22/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		9/28/2011	vs	9/28/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Partially Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		Non Profit - Corporation	vs	For Profit - Limited Liability Company
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		Yes	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		No	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		75.2	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		75.2	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		5	vs	7
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		110	vs	91
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.34	vs	0.63
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.69	vs	0.88
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		2.03	vs	1.51
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.01	vs	0.06
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.01	vs	0.06
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/25/2011date Of Correction: 01/26/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/28/2012date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/20/2009date Of Correction: 10/28/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 01/25/2011date Of Correction: 01/26/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 03/28/2012date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 09/15/2009date Of Correction: 10/08/2009	vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 08/31/2011date Of Correction: 09/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/22/2010date Of Correction: 04/08/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 10/20/2009date Of Correction: 10/28/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 03/28/2012date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 03/24/2011date Of Correction: 05/08/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.survey Date: 05/03/2011date Of Correction: 05/30/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		17.9 (64.2)	vs	26.6 (79.9)
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		75.2 %	vs	1.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		23.2 %	vs	26.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		6 %	vs	3.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		11.9 %	vs	4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		35.5 %	vs	47.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		4.7 %	vs	4.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		5.5 %	vs	17.3:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		0.9 %	vs	20.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		4.5 %	vs	5.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		16 %	vs	41.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		63.2 %	vs	82.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		60.5 %	vs	92 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		3.6 %	vs	6.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		19.4:1	vs	26.6 (79.9)
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		1.1 %	vs	1.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		25.7 %	vs	22.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		5.9 %	vs	5.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		10.7:1	vs	5.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		34.3 %	vs	48.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		4 %	vs	5.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		3.5 %	vs	16.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		1.3 %	vs	18.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		6 %	vs	7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		4.1 %	vs	6.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		24.5 %	vs	40.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		63.5 %	vs	79.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		62.6 %	vs	91.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		11.5 %	vs	29.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare WINSTON CO NH vs CORNERSTONE HEALTH AND REHAB OF CORINTH, LLC Nursing Homes USA