Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Water Valley
vs
Raleigh
State attribute explanation
Ms
vs
Ms
Street
630 South Main Street/p. O. Box 728
vs
309 Magnolia Dr/highway 35 South
Zip Code
38,965
vs
39,153
Phone
6,624,731,411
vs
6,017,824,244
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
122
vs
121
Total Number of Residents
120
vs
105
Percent of Occupied Beds
98 %
vs
87 %
Health Survey Date
5/27/2011
vs
8/31/2011
Fire Survey Date
5/25/2011
vs
9/2/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicaid
vs
Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Government - County
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
120
vs
105
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.46
vs
0.6
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07
vs
1.05
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.52
vs
1.65
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03
vs
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/29/2011date Of Correction: 01/10/2012
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/15/2011date Of Correction: 03/29/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 11/29/2011date Of Correction: 01/10/2012
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 02/15/2011date Of Correction: 03/29/2011
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/29/2011date Of Correction: 01/10/2012
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 03/16/2010date Of Correction: 04/10/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.4 %
vs
34.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.8 %
vs
24.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 %
vs
7.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5 %
vs
37.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.8:1
vs
13.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.4 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.7 %
vs
11.2-20
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7 %
vs
2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.5 %
vs
33.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 %
vs
5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.8 %
vs
24.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 %
vs
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9 %
vs
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24 %
vs
35.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 %
vs
12.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.9 %
vs
10 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.5 %
vs
12.3:1
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.2 %
vs
36 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.1 %
vs
96.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.5 %
vs
92.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4 %
vs
Compare YALOBUSHA COUNTY NURSING HOME vs ROLLING ACRES RETIREMENT CENTE Nursing Homes USA
cancel