VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ALDEN POPLAR CREEK REHAB & HCC

ALDEN POPLAR CREEK REHAB & HCC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ALDEN POPLAR CREEK REHAB & HCC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City HOFFMAN ESTATES   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have HOFFMAN ESTATES
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 1545 BARRINGTON ROAD  
Zip Code 60194  
Phone 8478840011  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
217  (108.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
184  (92.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
85 % (1.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/12/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/17/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 6  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
184  (92.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.16  (0.43 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 06/27/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/15/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.5 % (8.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (32.35 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8 % (14.86 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.4 % (1.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.7 % (3.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.1 % (9.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.8 % (6.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 % (24.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.9 (55.2) % (12.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.1 % (14.54 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
53.8 % (30.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8 % (10.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.3 % (6.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1 % (13 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.2 % (2.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9 % (3.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.9 % (17.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.3 % (3.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 % (16.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2 % (5.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.9 % (12.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.8 % (14.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
57.3 % (17.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.2 (68.4) % (2.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved