VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ALL SAINTS SUBACUTE AND REHABILITATION CENTER

ALL SAINTS SUBACUTE AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ALL SAINTS SUBACUTE AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAN LEANDRO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SAN LEANDRO
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 1652 MONO AVENUE  
Zip Code 94578  
Phone 5104813200  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
86  (22.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
80  (11.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/11/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/26/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(52.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(4.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
80  (11.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 02/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/11/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/28/2012
date Of Correction: 04/27/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/07/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.5 % (20.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
23.1 % (10.52 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
16.8 % (1.17 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3 % (22.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3 % (40.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.9 % (1.74 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78 % (5.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.3 % (20.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.8 % (11.7 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
17.6 % (8.38 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 14.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.6 % (15.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.9 % (35.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
51.5 % (26.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.2 % (5.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
72 % (2.75 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.6 % (13.74 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved