VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > APPLE REHAB SAYBROOK

APPLE REHAB SAYBROOK

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
APPLE REHAB SAYBROOK VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OLD SAYBROOK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have OLD SAYBROOK
State attribute explanation CT   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have CT
Street 1775 BOSTON POST RD  
Zip Code 6475  
Phone 8603996216  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
109  (17.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/26/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/26/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
109  (17.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.26  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 11/25/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/16/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/07/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 11/25/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 01/11/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Doctor Approves A Resident's Admission In Writing And That Each Resident Remains Under The Care Of A Doctor.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 11/25/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 10/14/2009
date Of Correction: 11/25/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.1 % (5.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (29.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9 % (11.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.1 % (0.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 % (14.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7 % (10.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 % (42.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.4 % (11.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.8 % (6.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.3 % (5.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.2 % (1.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.5 % (19.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 % (4.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.9 % (3.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.5 % (15.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (7.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2 % (6.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.2 % (37.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 % (8.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32 % (7.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.3 % (18.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.6 % (8.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
25.4 % (8.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved