VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ARIZONA STATE VETERAN HOME-PHX

ARIZONA STATE VETERAN HOME-PHX

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ARIZONA STATE VETERAN HOME-PHX VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PHOENIX   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have PHOENIX
State attribute explanation AZ   vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ
Street 4141 NORTH S HERRERA WAY  
Zip Code 85012  
Phone 6022481550  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
200  (91.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
171  (79.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
86 % (2.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/27/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - State  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 19  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
171  (79.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.54  (0.23 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.24  (0.6 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.78  (0.81 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 02/28/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/27/2011
date Of Correction: 11/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 09/27/2011
date Of Correction: 11/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 09/27/2011
date Of Correction: 11/07/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/02/2011
date Of Correction: 04/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/02/2011
date Of Correction: 04/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get X-rays And Other Tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Food In A Way That Meets A Resident's Needs.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 02/28/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.5 % (0.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (31.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1 % (6.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (5.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
16.5 % (0.87 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 % (7.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.8 % (17.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.9 % (1.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3 % (3.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78 % (5.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.1 % (1.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (23 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.5 % (3.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (1.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.6 % (9.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
12.9 (55.2) % (2.25 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1 % (3.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.2 % (9.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9 % (9.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.7 % (4.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.1 % (2.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77 % (2.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.50 % (15.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved