ASHTON PARKE CARE CENTER INC

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	75.2 %
City	TEXAS CITY	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have TEXAS CITY
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	210 GULF FREEWAY
Zip Code	77591
Phone	4099350300
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	100 (8.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (100)
Total Number of Residents	63 (28.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (63)
Percent of Occupied Beds	63 % (20.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (63) %
Health Survey Date	1/12/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/11/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	63 (28.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.54 (0.23 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.73 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.28 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (5.48 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 09/01/2011 date Of Correction: 09/23/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 12/09/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 09/01/2011 date Of Correction: 09/23/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 09/01/2011 date Of Correction: 09/23/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 04/03/2012 date Of Correction: 04/27/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/01/2011 date Of Correction: 09/23/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs. survey Date: 09/01/2011 date Of Correction: 09/23/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	34.5 % (9.41 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.7 % (30.25 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	21.7 % (5.04 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.1 % (1.48 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.3 % (6.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.6 % (14.03 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.8 % (11.66 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	8.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	45.5 % (38.44 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5 % (10.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	29.6 % (4.21 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.9 % (20.8 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	27.4 % (13.3 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	16 % (6.78 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.3 % (1.2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	45.1 % (1.72 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.9 % (8.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.7 % (7.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.4 % (16.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.3 % (6.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	45.5 % (20.74 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	25 % (56.44 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	32.4 (90.3) % (42.35 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %