VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > AURORA SENIOR LIVING OF DERRY, LLC

AURORA SENIOR LIVING OF DERRY, LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
AURORA SENIOR LIVING OF DERRY, LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City DERRY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have DERRY
State attribute explanation NH   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NH
Street 20 CHESTER ROAD  
Zip Code 3038  
Phone 6034323801  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
62  (46.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
61  (30.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/2/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
61  (30.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.56  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.19  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (5.35 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/25/2010
date Of Correction: 05/09/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/25/2010
date Of Correction: 05/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/25/2010
date Of Correction: 05/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/31/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 09/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/31/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors See A Resident's Plan Of Care At Every Visit And Make Notes About Progress And Orders In Writing.
survey Date: 09/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/31/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/25/2010
date Of Correction: 05/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/31/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.4 (88.5) % (6.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 % (4.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3 % (9.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.5 % (1.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.5 % (0.04 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9 % (26.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.7 % (37.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39 % (13.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.1 % (5.54 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.8 % (2.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (9.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.3 % (3.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.1 % (1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.1 % (8.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 % (3 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.8 % (4.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.5 % (1.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3 % (18.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.9 % (36.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35 % (10.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.3 % (2.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.5 % (4.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 % (4.36 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved