VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BELKNAP COUNTY NURSING HOME

BELKNAP COUNTY NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BELKNAP COUNTY NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LACONIA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LACONIA
State attribute explanation NH   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NH
Street 30 COUNTY DRIVE  
Zip Code 3246  
Phone 6035275410  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
94  (14.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
93  (1.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
99 % (15.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/18/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/18/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
93  (1.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.76  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.53  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/21/2011
date Of Correction: 08/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 11/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/21/2011
date Of Correction: 08/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 11/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 02/25/2010
date Of Correction: 04/11/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/25/2010
date Of Correction: 04/11/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.
survey Date: 06/21/2011
date Of Correction: 08/05/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.6 % (3.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (10.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.5 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 % (14.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.7 (69.3) % (4.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.1 % (7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 % (6.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2 % (2.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.6 % (12.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7 % (3.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2 % (3.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (9.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.5 % (15.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved