Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
BELKNAP COUNTY NURSING HOME | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
93 (1.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.76 (0.01 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.77 (0.07 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.53 (0.06 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.04 (5.45 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.04 (0.06 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/05/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/05/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 02/25/2010 date Of Correction: 04/11/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/25/2010 date Of Correction: 04/11/2010 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews. survey Date: 06/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/05/2011 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
21.6 % (3.49 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
6.5 % (10.16 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
3.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
3.3 % (8.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
6.5 % (9.13 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 9.9:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1.1 % (14.42 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
20.7 (69.3) % (4.69 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
7.1 % (7 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
2.8 % (6.42 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
6.2 % (2.3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
30.6 % (12.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
7 % (3.65 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
6.2 % (3.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1.50 % (9.23 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
90.5 % (15.75 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|