VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BENBROOK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

BENBROOK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BENBROOK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BENBROOK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BENBROOK
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1000 MCKINLEY ST  
Zip Code 76126  
Phone 8172490020  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
115  (6.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
97  (5.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/15/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/14/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
97  (5.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (0.52 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.14  (0.45 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 10/31/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/22/2010
date Of Correction: 02/22/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 01/22/2010
date Of Correction: 02/22/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 07/21/2010
date Of Correction: 08/20/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 04/28/2011
date Of Correction: 05/31/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 04/28/2011
date Of Correction: 05/31/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 07/21/2010
date Of Correction: 08/20/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/20/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
53.7 % (28.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.2 % (6.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 % (0.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.4 % (2.14 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5 % (8.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.3 % (40.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
33.3 % (51.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
6.9 % (77.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (11.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
53.3 % (27.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24 % (9.9 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 % (2.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.7 % (3.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34 % (9.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.8 % (4.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5 % (16.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.2 % (31.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3 % (7.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39.6 % (14.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
32.4 (90.3) % (49.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
8.8 % (65.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.4 % (11.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved