VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BOULEVARD REHABILITATION CENTER

BOULEVARD REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BOULEVARD REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City BOYNTON BEACH   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BOYNTON BEACH
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 2839 S SEACREST BOULEVARD  
Zip Code 33435  
Phone 5617322464  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
167  (58.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
157  (65.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/28/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
157  (65.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.04  (0.2 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.41  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (5.22 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 08/23/2011
date Of Correction: 09/23/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 08/23/2011
date Of Correction: 09/23/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 08/25/2010
date Of Correction: 09/25/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 07/23/2010
date Of Correction: 08/23/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 06/11/2012
date Of Correction: 07/11/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 02/28/2012
date Of Correction: 04/10/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/23/2010
date Of Correction: 08/23/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/23/2011
date Of Correction: 09/23/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (32.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.5 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.9-28 % (2.32 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (4.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
70 % (25.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (13.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.8 % (10.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.6 % (8.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.8 % (15.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5 - 2.0 % (45.4 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7 % (11.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.5 % (3.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2 % (5.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.9 (55.2) % (3.68 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (0.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
68.9 % (25.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (6.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9 % (5.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3 % (19.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.8 % (4.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.3 % (17.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.1 % (24.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13 % (4.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved