VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CARE ONE AT KING JAMES

CARE ONE AT KING JAMES

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CARE ONE AT KING JAMES VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NAVESINK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NAVESINK
State attribute explanation NJ   vs 2.4% Nursing Homes USA have NJ
Street 1040 HIGHWAY 36  
Zip Code 7752  
Phone 7322913400  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
127  (18.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
103  (11.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
81 % (2.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/8/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/8/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
103  (11.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07  (0.23 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.01  (0.42 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (5.24 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (0.15 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/06/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 02/03/2010
date Of Correction: 02/07/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 02/03/2010
date Of Correction: 02/07/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/20/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5 % (7.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (31.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.5 % (7.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6 % (10.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.8 % (6.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3 % (7.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.8 % (38.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.6 % (14.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.2 % (1.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.7 % (14.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5 % (9.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8 % (12.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8 % (5.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
6.7 % (36.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10 % (0.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5 % (1.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 % (17.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 % (33.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9 % (9.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12 % (12.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.4 % (0.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.5 % (23.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.3 % (15.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved