VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CARTHAGE LTC PARTNERS, INC

CARTHAGE LTC PARTNERS, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CARTHAGE LTC PARTNERS, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CARTHAGE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have CARTHAGE
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 501 COTTAGE RD  
Zip Code 75633  
Phone 9036937141  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
108  (0.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
48  (43.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
44 % (39.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/22/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(52.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
23  (15.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
48  (43.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.38  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.03  (0.19 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.41  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 06/30/2011
date Of Correction: 07/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/18/2009
date Of Correction: 09/08/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/08/2012
date Of Correction: 05/24/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/08/2012
date Of Correction: 05/24/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/25/2011
date Of Correction: 11/25/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/25/2011
date Of Correction: 11/25/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 10/25/2011
date Of Correction: 11/25/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 06/30/2011
date Of Correction: 07/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 06/30/2011
date Of Correction: 07/30/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Use A Registered Nurse At Least 8 Hours A Day, 7 Days A Week.
survey Date: 03/22/2010
date Of Correction: 04/03/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/18/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/18/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 11/04/2009
date Of Correction: 12/02/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 11/04/2009
date Of Correction: 12/02/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/30/2011
date Of Correction: 07/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 01/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/18/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 10/04/2010
date Of Correction: 10/30/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20 % (5.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 21.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 17.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4 % (9.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3 % (21.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (13.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8 % (5.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.2 % (10.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6 % (4.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 % (0.3 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30 % (13.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 % (6.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 % (15.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.5 % (12.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84 % (2.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75 % (0.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved