VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CHERRY LANE

CHERRY LANE

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CHERRY LANE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LAUREL   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LAUREL
State attribute explanation MD   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have MD
Street 9001 CHERRY LANE  
Zip Code 20708  
Phone 4107928275  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
155  (46.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
152  (60.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/6/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/5/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
14  (6.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
152  (60.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.5 - 2.0  (0.27 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.55 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.89  (0.3 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22  (5.27 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/08/2011
date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 10/08/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 02/08/2011
date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Clinical Record Information Safe, So That It Will Not Be Lost, Destroyed Or Used By The Wrong Person.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 10/08/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 02/08/2011
date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.8 % (10.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (31.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9 % (14.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.20 % (10.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6 % (5.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.9 % (13.36 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (12.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 % (9.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.6 % (2.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.4 % (5.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.2 % (8.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9 (55.2) % (12.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3 % (12.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 % (3.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9 % (4.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.4 % (5.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4 % (2.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3 % (18.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2 % (8.56 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88 % (6.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.9 % (16.15 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 10.1:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved