VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CITRUS GARDENS OF FORT MYERS

CITRUS GARDENS OF FORT MYERS

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CITRUS GARDENS OF FORT MYERS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FORT MYERS   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have FORT MYERS
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 7173 CYPRESS DRIVE SW  
Zip Code 33907  
Phone 2399360203  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
115  (23.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/28/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/24/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
115  (23.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.48  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/12/2012 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Follow Policies And Procedures To Convey The Resident's Personal Funds To The Appropriate Party Responsible After The Resident's Death.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 06/03/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 08/22/2011
date Of Correction: 09/16/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 09/16/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Limit The Charges Against The Personal Funds Of A Resident For Items Or Services For Which Payment Is Made Under Medicare Or Medicaid.
survey Date: 09/22/2009
date Of Correction: 10/22/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 09/16/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 09/16/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/12/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.3 % (5.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.1 % (2.27 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.7 % (22.16 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (12.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 % (5.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 % (41.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
41.9 % (16.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.4 % (3.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.7 % (0.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3 % (12.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.1 % (4.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (20.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.6 (65.5) % (4.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 % (3.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.4-2413.6-24 % (3.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
69.6 % (26.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 % (1.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3 % (35.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.7 % (8.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5 % (0.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
80.1 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 8.9 / 9.9 % 


Scroll To Top

saved