COLONIAL HILL OF ROCHESTER CARE AND REHABILITATION

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Rochester	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Rochester
State attribute explanation	NH	vs	0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NH	compare NH Nursing Homes USA
Street	62 ROCHESTER HILL ROAD
Zip Code	3867
Phone	6033353955
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	79 (29.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (79)
Total Number of Residents	78 (13.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (78)
Percent of Occupied Beds	99 % (15.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (99) %
Health Survey Date	4/19/2012
Fire Survey Date	4/19/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	78 (13.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.75 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.8 (0.04 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.55 (0.04 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (5.35 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (0.04 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/26/2011 date Of Correction: 07/15/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/19/2012 date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/19/2012 date Of Correction: 05/25/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 05/26/2011 date Of Correction: 07/15/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 07/09/2010 date Of Correction: 08/16/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 07/09/2010 date Of Correction: 08/16/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 05/26/2011 date Of Correction: 07/15/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	9.8 % (15.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.9 % (31.05 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.2 % (6.46 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.1 % (1.48 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	12.8:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2 % (13.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2 % (11.46 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.9 % (24.48 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	38.4 % (13.38 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	95 % (10.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	96.2 % (12.26 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2 % (13.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	11.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	12 % (2.1 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.6 % (1.62 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.3 % (1.2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	44.2 % (0.82 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.6 % (4.98 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.2 % (14.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.5 % (6.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	34.6 % (9.84 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	87.3 % (5.86 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	96.3 % (21.55 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	16 % (1.34 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %