VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > COURTYARD NURSING CARE CENTER

COURTYARD NURSING CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
COURTYARD NURSING CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MEDFORD   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have MEDFORD
State attribute explanation MA   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MA
Street 200 GOVERNORS AVENUE  
Zip Code 2155  
Phone 7813915400  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
224  (115.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
210  (118.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/12/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/9/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
210  (118.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.11 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.67  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/15/2011
date Of Correction: 10/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/16/2010
date Of Correction: 09/20/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 03/11/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 03/11/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests.
survey Date: 08/26/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get X-rays Or Tests Only When They Are Ordered By The Attending Physician.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.7 % (0.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (32.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.8 % (10.86 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 % (1.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.3 % (4.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.3 % (1.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1 % (7.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 % (23.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.5 - 2.0 % (43.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.5-24 % (5.52 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.4 % (11.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.7 % (6.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.9 % (9.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.4 % (1.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (23.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 % (9.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.9 % (2.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4 % (5.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2 % (15.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 % (38.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 21.2:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.6 % (6.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.9 % (14.15 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.8 % (12.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved