VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRAWFORD COUNTY CARE CENTER

CRAWFORD COUNTY CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRAWFORD COUNTY CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAEGERTOWN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SAEGERTOWN
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 20881 STATE HIGHWAY 198  
Zip Code 16433  
Phone 8147632445  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
157  (48.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
149  (57.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/16/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/22/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
149  (57.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.45  (0.32 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/13/2011
date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/21/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition.
survey Date: 03/21/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 03/21/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Special Or Therapeutic Diets Are Ordered By The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 09/13/2011
date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 % (4.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (30.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.3 % (8.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2 % (4.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2 % (5.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (5.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3 % (14.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.5 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4 % (24.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (42.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.8 % (6.78 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.4 % (6.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.7 % (7.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.8 % (8.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.9 % (5.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.7 % (20 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.6 (78.1) % (11.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.2 % (0.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.5 % (14.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 % (9.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4 % (5.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (37.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.4 % (3.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 21.2:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.5 % (10.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93 % (18.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 5.6:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved